<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DFEH Allows Employees To Obtain Immediate Right-To-Sue Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.griegolaw.com/2008/06/26/dfeh-allows-employees-to-obtain-immediate-right-to-sue-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.griegolaw.com/2008/06/26/dfeh-allows-employees-to-obtain-immediate-right-to-sue-online/</link>
	<description>Updates and insights regarding California Employment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.griegolaw.com/2008/06/26/dfeh-allows-employees-to-obtain-immediate-right-to-sue-online/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calemploymentlaw.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government Code Section 12965 says that if an accusation is not issued within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or &quot;if the department earlier determines that no accusation will issue,&quot;  the department must must notify the complainant &quot;that the department shall issue, on his or her request, the right-to-sue notice.&quot;  If the complainant does not request a right-to-sue notice the department must issue the notice &quot;upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint.&quot;

If a complainant asks for an immediate right-to-sue the DFEH knows it will not issue an accusation.  Therefore the DFEH can issue a right-to-sue notice immediately upon the complainant&#039;s request.

There are several cases that say the scope of the investigation is within the discretion of the DFEH.  The DFEH has long interpreted these decisions and their ability to issue a right-to-sue notice upon request as giving them the right to issue the notice even if no investigation is conducted. See, e.g. http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/DFEH/Publications/directives/DFEH-Directive234.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government Code Section 12965 says that if an accusation is not issued within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or &#8220;if the department earlier determines that no accusation will issue,&#8221;  the department must must notify the complainant &#8220;that the department shall issue, on his or her request, the right-to-sue notice.&#8221;  If the complainant does not request a right-to-sue notice the department must issue the notice &#8220;upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint.&#8221;</p>
<p>If a complainant asks for an immediate right-to-sue the DFEH knows it will not issue an accusation.  Therefore the DFEH can issue a right-to-sue notice immediately upon the complainant&#8217;s request.</p>
<p>There are several cases that say the scope of the investigation is within the discretion of the DFEH.  The DFEH has long interpreted these decisions and their ability to issue a right-to-sue notice upon request as giving them the right to issue the notice even if no investigation is conducted. See, e.g. <a href="http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/DFEH/Publications/directives/DFEH-Directive234.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/DFEH/Publications/directives/DFEH-Directive234.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sutton</title>
		<link>http://blog.griegolaw.com/2008/06/26/dfeh-allows-employees-to-obtain-immediate-right-to-sue-online/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calemploymentlaw.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-1318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is the statutory authority for the DFEH to issue immediate right-to-sue letters?  Am I right in concluding that there is no express authority?  The DFEH says in its Enforcement Division Directive that &quot;it is the Department&#039;s position that restricted staff resources make it impossible to complete a full investigation and determine whether to issue an accusation within 150 days.&quot;  

Thus, it sounds to me like the DFEH just decided it had the authority to bypass the investigation and simply issue a right-to-sue letter because if the plaintiff waited the whole year the DFEH would still have to issue the letter.  Is this your understanding too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the statutory authority for the DFEH to issue immediate right-to-sue letters?  Am I right in concluding that there is no express authority?  The DFEH says in its Enforcement Division Directive that &#8220;it is the Department&#8217;s position that restricted staff resources make it impossible to complete a full investigation and determine whether to issue an accusation within 150 days.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Thus, it sounds to me like the DFEH just decided it had the authority to bypass the investigation and simply issue a right-to-sue letter because if the plaintiff waited the whole year the DFEH would still have to issue the letter.  Is this your understanding too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

